The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), led by Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, has taken strong exception to the publication in the Guardian Newspaper of September 19, 2025, written by Emeka Nwokedi and titled “Nnamdi Kanu and the drama foretold.”
The article reflects a disturbing decline in journalistic standards, where misinformation and poorly reasoned commentary are presented as fact.
1. On the Question of Repealed Law
It is a basic principle of law that once legislation is repealed, it no longer exists. Section 6(1) of Nigeria’s Interpretation Act clearly establishes this position. The Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013 has been repealed by the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act 2022. Therefore, any charge still anchored on the 2013 Act is null and void.
That the Guardian and its columnist fail to understand this fundamental point raises serious concerns about both their legal literacy and editorial judgment.
2. On the Supreme Court’s Role
No ruling of the Supreme Court can revive a law that has already been repealed. A decision made in error (per incuriam) does not suddenly legitimize illegality. Nigeria’s judiciary must not be turned into a platform for manufacturing jurisdiction where none exists.
3. On Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s Health Condition
The Guardian’s attempt to dismiss Mazi Nnamdi Kanu’s failing health as “propaganda” is cruel and irresponsible. How can routine medical check-ups be called propaganda when his blood has been extracted over fifty (50) times, flown abroad for special testing, and when he suffers from multiple organ complications? To downplay this reality is not only reckless but inhuman.
4. The Role of the Media
The Guardian Newspaper, once respected for its professionalism, now appears willing to act as a mouthpiece for the state by publishing distorted narratives. Instead of upholding the sacred duty of truth, it has chosen to lend its platform to propaganda and misinformation.
5. The Bigger Context
Those pushing for the conviction of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu under repealed laws backed by questionable civil orders will not succeed. Rather, this case has exposed the decay within Nigeria’s judicial system and educated millions of Nigerians on the dangers of legal manipulation.
Conclusion
Emeka Nwokedi’s article is not informed commentary—it is shallow propaganda. The Guardian’s complicity in publishing it only highlights the extent to which some Nigerian institutions are entangled in the persecution of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.
Let the world take note: Nnamdi Kanu is being persecuted, not prosecuted, under laws that no longer exist while battling serious health issues in DSS custody. History will remember those who stood on the side of truth, and those who chose propaganda over justice.
Signed:
Comrade Emma Powerful
Spokesperson, Media and Publicity Secretary
Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB)
