Justice James Omotosho has begun delivering his judgment in the matter involving Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, doing so in Kanu’s absence from the courtroom.
This has sparked considerable public reaction, as the presence of a defendant is often viewed as crucial during the pronouncement of a judgment.
The decision to proceed without him has prompted conversations about due process, judicial discretion, and what this development might mean for the future of the case and broader legal proceedings connected to it.
